[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Me
- To: gmendelson(at-nospam)bloomberg.com
- Subject: Re: Me
- From: Oleg Goldshmidt <ogoldshmidt(at-nospam)comgates.co.il>
- Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:38:16 +0200
- Cc: ogoldshmidt(at-nospam)comgates.co.il (Oleg Goldshmidt), stav(at-nospam)actcom.co.il (Adi Stav), boaz(at-nospam)linuxqa.com (Boaz Rymland), linux-il(at-nospam)linux.org.il (Linux-IL Mailing List)
- Delivered-To: linux.org.il-linux-il@linux.org.il
- In-Reply-To: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"'s message of "Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:26:40 +0200 (IST)"
- References: <200012131426.OAA02661@nardis.bfr.co.il>
- Sender: ogoldshmidt(at-nospam)comgates.co.il
- Sender: linux-il-bounce(at-nospam)cs.huji.ac.il
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands)
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@bfr.co.il> writes:
> Though the whole point of "Red Hat Linux" was to make the great unwashed
> brand aware of Linux and that brand was Red Hat.
Bob Young talked explicitly and eloquently about branding as a part of
RH strategy in "Open Sources". The expectation was that the
uninitiated would proceed from "What's that Linux thing?" to "How do i
find out about Linux" to "www.redhat.com". That's exactly my point -
RH is a brand, Linux isn't.
> This would make Red Hat, Inc. worth a lot of money (I think it's all
> time high was about $90 a share).
You should know: RHAT Eqty GP <Go>
[that's between Geoff and me, guys ;-)].
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | Comgates Ltd. | ogoldshmidt@comgates.co.il
"... We work by wit, and not by witchcraft;
And wit depends on dilatory time."
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il
- References:
- Re: Me
- From: Geoffrey S. Mendelson