[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why I should not use DHTML ?
Actually Netscape attempted to follow up the standard, but it was a moving
target as far as I know. The release of 4.0 was compliant with what they figured
was gonna be the standard at the time, under the constraint that they were there
before the standard. They plan to support the standard in 5.0, but as we know
the 5.0 is not upto schedule... The reason IE is more compliant with the
standard is that its 5.0 version is a later release...
Cheers,
Yuval.
Eitan Shefer wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Uri Bruck wrote:
>
> >
> > DHTML is definitely not an MS standard.
> > See www.w3.org
>
> Yup, afaik, in this case MS is actually more complient with W3 standards
> then Netscape. And the really bizzar thing is that Mozilla is NOT backward
> compatible with Netscrape 4.0, but it is compatible with Exploder.
>
> (netscape woke up and saw that not complying with W3 hurt them in the
> end.)
>
>
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il
--
Yuval El-Hanany | Kawasaki GPZ500 '97 |
qwmiwn@geocities.com | | Have backpack,
Home : 972-3-6993301 | Debian Linux Inside | will travel
Work : 972-9-9586077-227| |
˛mzwfj)mXު笷b\"a{
+wr{zw/(fu!칻&fXު笷b