[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OO no... here we gOO again...
SS>> Suppose C++ has a great feature, which makes writing easily
SS>> maintainable code a brease, but is not in the "official" OO
SS>> specification. Obviously, C++ is not an OO language in that
SS>> respect, but who cares?
We can also suppose C++ hasn't some of features that are in "official" OO
specification, but who cares? All we got besides C++ is Java, which I
don't want to see anywhere near me, at least not in the source form.
SS>> Arguments about which is a better programming languages, I can
SS>> understand.
Reading
http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_0005_01/msg00095.html
could provide a bunch of enlightment. It is a part of another discussion,
but the idea behind is... well, enlightening :)
--
frodo@sharat.co.il \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425 /\ JRRT LotR.
http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il