[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stupid Bezeq



Actually I didn't really get where the problem is. After all the private
network ends at the NAT gateway and about anything outside you just don't
care.

If you connect to places that run a private net via some tunnel over the
public IP net, then again you don't care wether part of this public IP
runs over some fake nets or not since only your two gateways have to (and
can) know about YOUR private nets.

So, where could the private provider net possible be a problem ?

Schlomo


 On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:

> SS>> Well, now you know why it is better to pick 192.168.*.* for
> SS>> private networks, even if you get to type more numbers :-)
> 
> Guess which address space will the second provider take? Bingo!
> 
> 

-- 
Schlomo Schapiro
Computation Authority
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Tel: ++972 / 2 / 65-84404
Fax:             65-27349
email: schapiro@clerk.pi.huji.ac.il
WWW:   http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il