[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another Semaphore question.
- To: Oded Arbel <odeda-linux-il(at-nospam)betalfa.org.il>
- Subject: Re: Another Semaphore question.
- From: "Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" <frodo(at-nospam)sharat.co.il>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 20:52:56 +0300 (IDT)
- cc: Linux-IL Mailing list <linux-il(at-nospam)cs.huji.ac.il>
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105061021090.20140-100000@europa.betalfa.org.il>
- Sender: linux-il-bounce(at-nospam)cs.huji.ac.il
OA>> I don't think its an option I have for the current
OA>> implementation - it's file IO, and should be much slower, right
OA>> ?
Wrong. Record locking has nothing to do with file I/O - it is done
entirely in memory.
--
frodo@sharat.co.il \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425 /\ JRRT LotR.
http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il