[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The wonderful world of GTK (rant)
- To: tzafrir(at-nospam)technion.ac.il
- Subject: Re: The wonderful world of GTK (rant)
- From: "Yosi" <natask(at-nospam)hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:34:06 -0000
- Cc: linux-il(at-nospam)linux.org.il
- Delivered-To: linux.org.il-linux-il@linux.org.il
- Sender: linux-il-bounce(at-nospam)cs.huji.ac.il
>Why not simply:
>
> rpm -ta gtk+-1.2.10.tar.gz
>
>or even only:
>
> rpm -tb gtk+-1.2.10.tar.gz
>
>(don't produce a source rpm at all)
But I do want the src.rpm . I then change the spec file so the package
will be compiled with the flags and configuration options I want to.
>From my experience, using the appropriate optimization flags for your
cpu (Athlon in my case) can result in a drastic performance increase.
For example, compiling Lame with special optimization flags yielded
an encoder which was almost 50% than the stock encoder.
However, you are right, that if you do not require any special options
in the package, just create the binary, as you suggested.
>What do you mean?
I mean that after you do ./configure, a <package_name>.spec is
produced. ProFTP daemon is one example.
Yosi
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il