[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why is linux not popular



I read somewhere that the Computer Gaming buissness roll more money then the
Holywood movie buisness, and thats mean lots of money.

When the big companys will think that this is the time to spread linux over
the world for home users in big mass ( if it will at all ) money will start
pour to development as quickly as possible to make the system ready to the
end user.

Untill then it will be very hard to conquer the world :(

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ira Abramov" <lists-linux-il@ira.scso.com>
To: "IGLU Mailing list" <linux-il@iglu.org.il>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: Why is linux not popular


> On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Boris Gorelik wrote:
>
> > OK, now I can say some bad things:
>
> sure, but why not constructive criticism instead?
>
> like marc and other posters before me said, if you choose a tool, don't
> complain but use it wisely. I have no interest in a dumbed-down user
> experiance, but it IS in my interest that someone else WILL take the
> chalange to build such a GUI on top of my beloved Linux kernel.
>
> Linux was not built to kick out windows, it was an experiment in OS
> design and implementation. GNU is, by definition, NOT Unix. it closely
> resembles it since it's the conveniant interface to a system the way its
> designers started it out, but it was never their intention to make a
> Unix clone, they wanted a strong set of OS tools that will be free (as
> in speach) and the Unix-resemblance was born out of their habits. the
> FSF's philosophy often does not coinside with Unix philosophy, and in
> fact I wish they would go longer distances in thinking outside of that
> box. more power to them.
>
> back to the subject. ofcourse Linux alone isn't layman friendly, it's a
> bloody kernel. GNU/Linux is better (great for my needs) but still far
> from laymen-friendly. There is an open market with ample opportunity for
> a company to build a GUI and Desktop Metaphore (X or not) and a set of
> tools, even make it closed source, on top of Linux. KDE and Gnome are
> attempting (not to my satisfaction so far), Caldera threatened with one
> and never carried it out, Microsoft has the power and manpower but not
> the will, and Apple actually DID such a thing, but picked the "wrong"
> kernel.
>
> I do not intend to shove it down newbies' throats anymore, I'm over that
> phase. I'll be more than happy if a good Mac-like GUI was built on top
> of that kernel, with approachable (read - not MSregistry-messy) backend
> where I, a Unix pro with no GUI inclinations, can make sense of if I
> come to fix a laman friend's machine.
>
> when the big power-hungry corporations of the world stop obfuscating and
> complexifying (yes, I do belive it's a word) their back and front ends
> for competition that hurts their clients, peace and harmony and
> STABILITY will finally reach the desktop.
>
> It's not user-friendly enough for you? take up NT or MAKE it friendly
> for the next generation. period. I'm too lazy, so I use it as is, and I
> don't complain.
>
> > 1. Until Linux is not_TRULY_ layman friendly, it has no chance in the
> > battle with MS-Windows and even with Mac-OS. I use RH7.1 and (with all
my
>
> why do you choose to see it as a battle? did anyone enlist you to the OS
> army at 18, put you in green uniform? snap out of it!
>
> GNU/Linux, and linux-il, is not about con... I mean Konquering the
> world, it's about technology and a little about the liberal concepts
> behind software freedom. a Wise man on a silly sticker once said
> "fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity". Be a flower child,
> distribute the free love in deb packages, but don't fight to make people
> understand, they make their own choices.
>
> > I don't know why, (or maybe I do know), but the Israeli popular computer
> > press (like Captain Internet) barely remind Linux. Two years ago, I
>
> because they speak to the lusers, not the computer power users. power
> users can read English and the internet and get their own info and
> education.
>
> > wrote Captain Internet and asked them to add a column dedicated to
linux, but
> > they never answered me.
>
> think of it as asking from a vacation magazine to publish an article on
> how hard-but-rewarding it is to run your own resort hotel. people open
> that magazine to learn about vacations, not on how to work hard running
> your own business so you can take a vacation in your back yard every
> other week after it starts returning the investment. Sure, it fits me
> and you, but not all the readers.
>
> > 2. HEBREW
> > I think it would be a good idea if someone release a _READY_ Hebrew
enabled
>
> I think it would be great if there was ONE Israeli company or government
> agency backing Pango or QT3 efforts for RTL. Fuck, I'd be happy if
> anyone in the middle east OTHER than Israel promoted it, but you have
> all sorts of Larses and Jurgens who never sat in the Israeli sun doing
> the work for you.
>
> if you want something done, do it yourself. IBM put an Israeli team on
> Gecko's Hebrew, and I thank them for that, Sun is embracing GtK and
> Gnome but not doing much for Pango and StarOffice in the direction of
> Hebrew. make it a national need' talk to your MKs and maybe things will
> look better, and ask Tzafrir/Hetz/Whoever if testers are needed. but
> complaining on the list doesn't help. I suppose the Ivrix mailing lists
> are the better place to raise this.
>
> Good luck,
> Ira.
>
> --
> Cinematographer of the revolution
> Ira Abramov
>
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il
>
>


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il