[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ipchains style
- To: guy keren <choo(at-nospam)actcom.co.il>
- Subject: Re: ipchains style
- From: Adi Stav <stav(at-nospam)actcom.co.il>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 08:27:11 +0200
- Cc: Jonathan Ben-Avraham <benavrhm(at-nospam)tcltek.co.il>, ILUG <linux-il(at-nospam)linux.org.il>
- Delivered-To: linux.org.il-linux-il@linux.org.il
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSU.4.30_heb2.09.0012310952080.29222-100000@actcom.co.il>; from choo@actcom.co.il on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 10:01:07AM +0200
- Mail-Followup-To: guy keren <choo@actcom.co.il>,Jonathan Ben-Avraham <benavrhm@tcltek.co.il>,ILUG <linux-il@linux.org.il>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012310739430.10147-100000@zivan.tcltek.co.il> <Pine.GSU.4.30_heb2.09.0012310952080.29222-100000@actcom.co.il>
- Sender: Adi Stav <adi(at-nospam)fred.stav>
- Sender: linux-il-bounce(at-nospam)cs.huji.ac.il
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 10:01:07AM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> btw, in the new kernel (2.4), where netfilter is used, there is a new
> notion of tables. unlike usage of multiple chains, usage of multiple
> tables does add extra functionality, in that it allows you to have one set
> of rules perform a complete "computation", and then the packets coming out
> of it are re-processed by the rules in a second table. i already so a case
> where this allowed for more functionality then s possible using kernel
> 2.2's chains.
Hmm. How is that different from from creating custom chains in
ipchains and sending packets from one chain to another?
- Adi Stav
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il