[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a Scheduler question...
- To: Ira Abramov <lists-linux-il(at-nospam)ira.abramov.org>
- Subject: Re: a Scheduler question...
- From: mulix <mulix(at-nospam)actcom.co.il>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:42:05 +0200 (IST)
- Cc: IGLU Mailing list <linux-il(at-nospam)iglu.org.il>
- Delivered-To: iglu.org.il-linux-il@iglu.org.il
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112271328310.14547-100000@max.fiasco.org.il>
- Sender: linux-il-bounce(at-nospam)cs.huji.ac.il
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, mulix wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Ira Abramov wrote:
>>
>> > of it? whay would anyone WANT it to decay automatically?!
>>
>> i can think of several reasons, but they all come down to "make the
>> admin's job easier". however, i find this rather brain-dead, since it
>> stands in direct contradiction with my One True Law of Computers -
>> they should do *only* and *exactly* what you tell them to.
>
> agreed. if I want a decay, I'll ask for it, specifying the rate and
> other parameters (or conditions) of when and how to do it.
>
> well, thanks.
don't mention it. sched.c makes for rather interesting reading.
>
> --
> He who must not be named
> Ira Abramov
ooh, a lovely paradox.
--
mulix
http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~mulix/
http://syscalltrack.sf.net/
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il