[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cox kernel?
- To: Hetz Ben-Hamo <hetz(at-nospam)kde.org>
- Subject: Re: Cox kernel?
- From: mulix <mulix(at-nospam)actcom.co.il>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 17:30:53 +0200 (IST)
- Cc: <muaddib(at-nospam)mailandnews.com>, <linux-il(at-nospam)linux.org.il>
- Delivered-To: linux.org.il-linux-il@linux.org.il
- In-Reply-To: <E16ABsG-0001kL-00@witch.dyndns.org>
- Sender: linux-il-bounce(at-nospam)cs.huji.ac.il
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Hetz Ben-Hamo wrote:
> > > So Rik's VM implementation is out, and other Linus stuff that were in the
> > > kernel (while they weren't in Alan's ac-tree) has been removed in favour
> > > of.. you guessed it - Alan's tree..
> >
> > ???
> > rik's vm is indeed out (although he is maintaining it himself),
> > but marcello started working from 2.4.15, which was linus' tree, not
> > alan's tree. i think you are mistaken here.
>
> Umm, sorry, you might want to look real close into the the sources of 2.4.14
> and 2.4.15 - all Alan's changes from Linus tree are in the 2.4.15 tree (look
> at the sound drivers for example - You could once make a driver with the
> kernel to play directly at 44Khz - now you can only 48Khz and downmix to
> 44Khz with a user space app)
guess you didnt read all of what i wrote. here it is:
> > to answer the original question, the important bits in -ac have been
> > merged into -linus before 2.4.15. as to the rest, i dont know. maybe
> > it's 2.5.x material. is there anything specific you're interested in,
> > tzahi?
obviously it's impossible for all of -ac to have been merged, since it
also included rik's vm...
--
mulix
http://www.pointer.co.il/~mulix/
http://syscalltrack.sf.net/
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request@linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request@linux.org.il