[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: new sendmail...?
At some point, Ira Abramov had written:
>
>
> tonight's mirror:
>
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/SRPMS/libc-5.3.12-17.src.rpm 1776215
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/SRPMS/sendmail-8.8.4-1.src.rpm 992534
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/libc-5.3.12-17.i386.rpm 310054
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/libc-debug-5.3.12-17.i386.rpm 1026474
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/libc-devel-5.3.12-17.i386.rpm 230318
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/libc-profile-5.3.12-17.i386.rpm 311354
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/libc-static-5.3.12-17.i386.rpm 313972
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/sendmail-8.8.4-1.i386.rpm 207211
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/sendmail-cf-8.8.4-1.i386.rpm 87780
> Got redhat-4.0/updates/i386/sendmail-doc-8.8.4-1.i386.rpm 451583
>
> is the new Sendmail a simple drop-in replacement for 8.7.*? I mean, do I
> get to keep my old sendmail.* files, or should I backup and integrate (or
> else miss the important new features)
As far as I understand, you should be able to just reuse your old
.cf file.
> I also understand it should now support virtual domains more easyly, is
> that true?
I haven't heard anything about that.
I've started to look at 'exim' as a MTA. Has anyone else done such?
Tim
Follow-Ups:
References: