[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Linux vs. Microsoft



______________________________
Eddie harari - unix dep.
Software Education LAbs - SELA
______________________________
Meseg sent at Tue Oct 15 09:23:46 GMT+0200 1996
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 935       

hi , I think I should say a few words about this -

()hello for everybody !!!
()--------------------------------

()
()if the X was as powerful as the MS-Windows 32bit OS linux will be better
()then Microsft
()
()

 X is more powerfull then MS - WINDOWS .
 
 it is more configurable, it is much more easy to program ...
 and guess what ?
 

  IT DOESNT HAVE TO RUN ON A - PC computer ... LIKE MS-WINDOWS 95 , .
  can you display an application output thru 95 on a diffrent terminal ?
  can you change your WM in w95 ?
  can you configure the menues in 95 ?
  do you have a virtual desktop in 95 ?

 with all respect - X is much much better then this M$(%*#&@t  code errors .
 
 well you probebly cant read this mail - because eudora says ( APPLICATION ERROR). can you ?

-- 
Eddie Harari  - phone: 972-3-6190999
                fax  : 972-3-6190992
                ___________________
                Take A Walk In The Wild Side ...


Follow-Ups: References: