[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Linux vs. Microsoft
Eddie Harari wrote:
>
> ______________________________
> Eddie harari - unix dep.
> Software Education LAbs - SELA
> ______________________________
> Meseg sent at Tue Oct 15 09:23:46 GMT+0200 1996
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Length: 935
>
> hi , I think I should say a few words about this -
>
> ()hello for everybody !!!
> ()--------------------------------
>
> ()
> ()if the X was as powerful as the MS-Windows 32bit OS linux will be better
> ()then Microsft
> ()
> ()
>
> X is more powerfull then MS - WINDOWS .
>
> it is more configurable, it is much more easy to program ...
> and guess what ?
>
>From time to time people publish things on this list that are
so out of this world, that any comment on it will be a waste of time.
The FUCKED dos7 isn't a 32 bit OS, for starters, it has so much 16 bit
code to
fill bill gates home.
Bye
References: