[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: 2 questions



On Thu, 12 Dec 1996, Udi Finkelstein wrote:

I don't want to start a fight here, ok?

> >> Do these utilities handle NTFS?  I doubt that.
> >
> >no, but NTFS makes no sense unless you run a server. for any other use NT
> The last answer I would expect to hear from a Unix user!
NT is the last OS you'd expect him to run! shudup!

> Using NT without NTFS means no file protections. Its just like saying that a
> Linux user should always work under root on his personal machine. It also
read again! I said "unless running a server"! if it's a workstation, FAT
will give you better speed.

> means your cluster size is much smaller than under FAT (NT does not support
> FAT32 yet).

and never will. read Microsoft's press releases more carefully.

> 
> >over FAT is faster, and I hope that's his setup too.
> Yes, FAT might be slightly faster (NTFS is fast enough for me) but I had
> enough of FAT.

My Linux servers are FAT free :-)


   -------------------------------------------------------------
   Ira Abramov          <ira@scso.com>        Scalable Solutions
   SITE Web Presence ("webspace for rent") http://www.site.co.il
   Beeper 91826 at 058-212121                FAX (972)2-643-0471
   POBox 3600, Jerusalem 91035, Israel       Tel (972)2-642-6822
   http://www.scso.com/~ira   Check out: http://www.linux.org.il


References: