[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Linux vs. Microsoft



______________________________
Eddie harari - unix dep.
Software Education LAbs - SELA
______________________________
Meseg sent at Wed Oct 16 10:05:41 GMT+0200 1996
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1297      

()>This is where you are Wrong ...
()>________________________________
()>
()>thae independent protocol is not just to use with terminals=20
()>it is to share an app output between arch's .
()
()Sorry, I do not understand what you mean here.

The X protocol , is not designed only so people can buy a diskless client such 
as X terminal and displey on it ...

 The main thing is that X runs on hetrogenus arch's and you can share the output between arch's - like Xoftware and X11 , you can play the Linux xtetris -
 thru your MS-WINDOWS machine.
 well that is power - and today we all know that many organizations have multi
 platform enviroment.

 can you do it on 95 ?  
 

 another thing is that WITH all respect , gui building in MS is much harder then
 it is in X enviroment , there is no tool like UIMX in the MS enviroment , 
 it is true that to build a GUI in X you should know much more about the motif and stuff related to X  , but this is allways true  when you are talking about 
 good programing enviroment .

 you should know much more about the system when you program unix then you should when programming DOS.



 

-- 
Eddie Harari  - phone: 972-3-6190999
                fax  : 972-3-6190992
                ___________________
                Take A Walk In The Wild Side ...


Follow-Ups: References: