[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Installation Party Summary
I see that the first Installation Party was not a total loss. Some
things were accomplished, and enough serious brains are trying to draw
conclusions and figure out how to do better next time.
> 1. The Washington Linux Users Group asks people to defrag & repartition
> *before* arriving. Maybe that would help...
Maybe not absolutely necessary. People can do it on the spot
simultaneously, using MS-DOS tools or whatever. Then hear a lecture
about installing Linux while their hard disks are busy whirring and
purring and defragmenting themselves.
> 2. I'd suggest settling on *one* distribution, and bringing as many
> copies as possible on as many media formats as possible. You should
> have one copy per person, so that everyone can be installing
> simultaneously. If you can manage this, then you can also give
> instructions from the front of the room, and have afew people going
> around helping out with particular problems.
I assume that even newbies may have special needs which require them to
have a distribution different from the Holy Standard Distribution to be
chosen whatever it is.
> 3. Aren't network installs are more trouble than their worth?
[... snipped description of some Finnish tortures ...]
I agree. This may have been worth it in the pre-CD era. Now there are
CD-ROM drives which can be connected via the Parallel Port, people no
longer need network installations to avoid having to swap 40 diskettes.
> 4. If having the organizers bring one copy per newbie is too hard,
> then require people to bring their own copy. It's cheap, and they'll
> probably find it useful to have the cd at home anyway when they want
> to install additional packages, search for special things, etc. I'd
> go so far as require a copy of linux on cd as an entrance pass.
As suggested above, another approach is for the organizers to provide for
a CD-ROM drive connected to the Parallel Port.
> 5. I often find that the biggest hassle with installing linux is
> finding out the details of peoples' hardware. So, lets have a form
> for people to fill out before coming. It should ask for *all* the
> details of their system (what cards, what brands, what configurations,
> what monitor (max hsync, max vsync, max dot clock), IRQs, dma usage,
> hard disk (chs, partition table, brand, ...) ...). If they come with
> enough info, it'll make the installations more foolproof, less risky,
> and make installing X easier (and safer).
VERY GOOD IDEA!
Have the users bring the display and video card user's manuals (I
remember having had pored for a while over my display's user's manual
while fine tuning my X configuration). In other words, add to the form
also a checklist of what hardware manuals to bring with the PC.
Also list what MS-DOS tools can be used to figure out the information
(taking into account also PnP devices' reconfigurability).
--- Omer
Follow-Ups:
References: