[Prev][Next][Index]
RE: Return to sender... Address unknown (hum along).
I agree with Harvey about having a little respect for the efforts donated to the group. Lets
keep it friendly and professional.
>Ira Abramov writes:
>>
>> that does it!
>>
>> who is the shlep that's running the show in JCT? move the the list to a
>> propper MAJORDOMO running on a propper LINUX and not some Novel junk, and
>> PLEASE configure the bounce messages to go to hell, instead of puffing up
>> my inbox! NIMAS! I get 2-4 of those for every post I make to the list!
> > and Ilan! poll more often, or use POP/UUCP, whatever.
>What is this becomming, Gripe-il?
>The "shlep" who set up Linux-il is the guy who set up the mailing list
>for us while everyone else was discussing how to do it, or whether or
>not to do it, or whether it should be a mailing list or a newsgroup.
>Shlep? I think not. So how about having a little respect. If you
>don't like all those bounces, maybe you shouldn't post so much :).
>To provide a little history, The Israel Linux Users started when I
>posted a message to il.something.or.other asking if anyone wanted to
>form a Linux users group. This quickly generated about 20 members, so
>I asked if anyone could set up a mailing list for the group. Well,
>while I started poking around, trying to figure out how I might set up
>a mailing list given that I don't have root privileges, and while
>people were suggesting to my "try procmail", "try majordomo", ...,
>Dovie Adler sent me a message volunteering (it's starting to look more
>and more like kamakazing every day) to set up the mailing list. I
>sent him back a message saying "It's ok - I'm looking into procmail &
>majordomo. I should be able to wire up something or other...".
>Within an hour, I received another message from Dovie - "Well, it
>wasn't a bother really. I've already got it set up."
>Thus was born Linux-il@hagigia, running under Novell!
>Now, as for the bounces, it's both of our faults. I have
>list-maintainer privileges, so I could remove the addresses that
>bounce. However, I haven't been mailing to Linux-il so often lately,
>so I'm not up on which addresses are the offenders (although I suppose
>I will be after I mail this). However, I don't want to just go and
>remove those addresses, because it might just be a temporary outage.
>So, Dovie - Can your server be set up *not* to reflect those messages
>back to the sender? Can you instead just log the undeliverables
>somewhere & periodically remove them from the list?
>Thanks,
>Harvey
Yossi B.