[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Insta-party comments
On Wed, 20 Nov 1996, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Eddie Harari <eddie@sela.co.il> wrote:
> |charging money for the installation , is not only for the people .
> |it is also for ILUG.
>
> It should be ONLY for the ILUG, if at all.
>
> |you never say - give me as much as you want ,this is a bad thing to do .
> |it is not for free and it does not have a price ????
> |
> |each one should pay the same price ! if you dont set a price you will allways
> |think that people gave too few , and they will think they gave too much ...
> |( I know that we are not like this , but we dont know the people we deal with)
> |.
> |
> |I say charge them , and give them the best service we can give,,,
> |We will mention that it can take awile ...
>
> If that's going to be the attitute in the IP's you organize then count
> me out of this.I'm not going to demand money for what we do there.
>
> Can anyone give a real estimation of how much the first IP cost us?I
> didn't have to pay anything except some spare time, which I consider
> to have been spent for a good cause, what about others?
>
> --Amos
>
> --Amos Shapira | "Of course Australia was marked for
> 133 Shlomo Ben-Yosef st. | glory, for its people had been chosen
> Jerusalem 93 805 | by the finest judges in England."
> ISRAEL amos@dsi.co.il | -- Anonymous
Don't you see that Linux-IL need money?
Look at the last computax as an example! we were half funded by Digital,
each of us contributed time and money, and yet, I'm sure Ira can tell you
about the financial damage Computax caused. (not to mention the CD
imports). I'm sure thinks like that hurt the "group spirit" even more
than charging 50-100 NIS for installing linux.
Follow-Ups:
References: