[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SlakWare or RedHat?
On Mon, 7 Oct 1996, Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 1996, Asaf Sabag wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > After a year of using SlakWare 3.0, I want to upgrade to 96 (3.1.0),
> >
> > What do you say: SlakWare 96 or RedHat???????
>
> never installed Slackware 3.1 yet, but I already shaved my head and become
> a redhist monk. RedHat 4.0 came out this week and sounds more promissing
> than ever... mirrored at my site, btw: ftp2.linux.org.il (well, not fully
> yet...)
As a hairy (before the army:) Debian monk, and a beginning Debian
package maintainer, I'd suggest our thingie, because of some
reasons:
1. RedHat (FTPed from redhat.{com|org, whar was it}) didn't install
on my system.
2. Debian, it seems, is upgraded faster.
3. I'd better use GPLed products than something ppl do for money,
because money != fun, and fun usually means quality (because ppl
like what they do).
Just my opinion.
Vadik.
++ _
Vadik V. (_` vadik@arbornet.org http://www.arbornet.org/~vadik/
Vygonets (_.lf For PGP public key, email me with sibject "get pgpkey"
Linux hackers are funny people: They count the time in patchlevels.
Follow-Ups:
References: