[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Linux vs. Microsoft
______________________________
Eddie harari - unix dep.
Software Education LAbs - SELA
______________________________
Meseg sent at Tue Oct 15 09:23:46 GMT+0200 1996
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 935
hi , I think I should say a few words about this -
()hello for everybody !!!
()--------------------------------
()
()if the X was as powerful as the MS-Windows 32bit OS linux will be better
()then Microsft
()
()
X is more powerfull then MS - WINDOWS .
it is more configurable, it is much more easy to program ...
and guess what ?
IT DOESNT HAVE TO RUN ON A - PC computer ... LIKE MS-WINDOWS 95 , .
can you display an application output thru 95 on a diffrent terminal ?
can you change your WM in w95 ?
can you configure the menues in 95 ?
do you have a virtual desktop in 95 ?
with all respect - X is much much better then this M$(%*#&@t code errors .
well you probebly cant read this mail - because eudora says ( APPLICATION ERROR). can you ?
--
Eddie Harari - phone: 972-3-6190999
fax : 972-3-6190992
___________________
Take A Walk In The Wild Side ...
Follow-Ups:
References: