[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Linux vs. Microsoft



Eddie Harari wrote:
> 
> ______________________________
> Eddie harari - unix dep.
> Software Education LAbs - SELA
> ______________________________
> Meseg sent at Tue Oct 15 09:23:46 GMT+0200 1996
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Length: 935
> 
> hi , I think I should say a few words about this -
> 
> ()hello for everybody !!!
> ()--------------------------------
> 
> ()
> ()if the X was as powerful as the MS-Windows 32bit OS linux will be better
> ()then Microsft
> ()
> ()
> 
>  X is more powerfull then MS - WINDOWS .
> 
>  it is more configurable, it is much more easy to program ...
>  and guess what ?
> 
>From time to time people publish things on this list that are 
so out of this world, that any comment on it will be a waste of time.
The FUCKED dos7 isn't a 32 bit OS, for starters, it has so much 16 bit
code to
fill bill gates home.
Bye



References: