[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Linux vs. Microsoft
Hi!
> ______________________________
> Eddie harari - unix dep.
> Software Education LAbs - SELA
> ______________________________
> hi , I think I should say a few words about this -
and I think, I should say a few words about this.
> ()
> ()if the X was as powerful as the MS-Windows 32bit OS linux will be better
> ()then Microsft
> ()
> ()
>
> X is more powerfull then MS - WINDOWS .
X and MS-Windoze are two completely different things. You can't even
compare them. The first is a display standard (sophisticated as it
may be), the second is an OS (of sorts).
Just BTW:
> can you display an application output thru 95 on a diffrent terminal ?
Yes.
> can you change your WM in w95 ?
Yes.
> can you configure the menues in 95 ?
What menus?
> do you have a virtual desktop in 95 ?
Yes.
AND:
there are several X terminal emulators for Win (3.1, 95, NT) and even
for DOS, to my knowledge, however, no one has made an X server for
these platforms.
> with all respect - X is much much better then this M$(%*#&@t code errors .
With all respect you should leave your zeal for worthwhile or at
least logical debates.
Eli Algranti <OR17367@elbit.co.il>
Follow-Ups: