[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LILO or NT-LOADER
On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Vadik V. Vygonets wrote:
> > I have it like this:
> >
> > NT loader ------>NT
> > \-----> DOS7 Multiboot ------> win95
> > \--> Loadlin
>
> Why using lodalin? You may use LILO:
> NT loader --> NT on MBR
> \-> LILO on Linux partition bootsector --> Linux
> \-> 95 Netul Oferet
A. because I hate to admit, but 95 is still my most use workstation OS,
and Linux for sever and admin (I am always with 2-3 Xterms open in my
win95, sometimes Netscape/Linux too :-) so win95 comes earlyer in the
bootmanager tree and is default.
B. because I hate LILO, anything wrong with that? it's much less
convenient than configurinloadlin...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ira Abramov <ira@scso.com> Scalable Solutions
SITE Web Presence ("webspace for rent") http://www.site.co.il
Beeper 91826 at 058-212121 FAX (972)2-643-0471
POBox 3600, Jerusalem 91035, Israel Tel (972)2-642-6822
http://www.scso.com/~ira Check out: http://www.linux.org.il
References: