[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: LILO or NT-LOADER



On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Vadik V. Vygonets wrote:

> > I have it like this:
> > 
> > NT loader ------>NT
> >             \-----> DOS7 Multiboot ------> win95
> >                                       \--> Loadlin
> 
> Why using lodalin?  You may use LILO:
> NT loader --> NT on MBR
>         \-> LILO on Linux partition bootsector --> Linux
>                                                \-> 95 Netul Oferet

A. because I hate to admit, but 95 is still my most use workstation OS,
and Linux for sever and admin (I am always with 2-3 Xterms open in my
win95, sometimes Netscape/Linux too :-) so win95 comes earlyer in the
bootmanager tree and is default.

B. because I hate LILO, anything wrong with that? it's much less
convenient than configurinloadlin...

   -------------------------------------------------------------
   Ira Abramov          <ira@scso.com>        Scalable Solutions
   SITE Web Presence ("webspace for rent") http://www.site.co.il
   Beeper 91826 at 058-212121                FAX (972)2-643-0471
   POBox 3600, Jerusalem 91035, Israel       Tel (972)2-642-6822
   http://www.scso.com/~ira   Check out: http://www.linux.org.il



References: