[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distributions ???????
On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Peter Lorand Peres wrote:
> If you are into hacking, definitely Slackware. Else RH has a good name for
> easy installation, but... it's too commercial for many's tastes. This
> means that it is different enough from 'standard' Linux to make you want
> ONLY RH packages after that.
I have to agree, I have been running self customized Slackware versions
from the start, but it needs much more attention at start, don't use
Slackware unless you know you'll be able to find & install everything
yourself, or unless you are into hacking like Peter here said.
RedHat will do just fine for you.
--Ariel
>
> OnSun, 14 Dec 1997, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > What is better: redhat or slackwere
> > What is the difference
> > why there is deference (can't they make just one distribution)
> >
>
> Peter Lorand Peres
> ------------------
> plp@actcom.co.il 100310.2360 on CIS (please use Internet address for mail)
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/plp
>
> "The creed of Inland Revenue is simple: 'If we can bring one little smile to one
> little face today - then somebody's screwed up somewhere' - David Frost
>
> (Note: The above stands valid in all countries until proven wrong)
>
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ariel Biener |
| e-mail: ariel@post.tau.ac.il Work ph: 03-6406086 |
| fingerprint = 07 D1 E5 3E EF 6D E5 82 0B E9 21 D4 3C 7D 8B BC |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+