[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RH4.2?
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Yaron wrote:
> Now, while package management methods, including RPM, do have advantages
> (tidy systems, saves time, etc), RPM is still pretty flakey. The reason
> the whole discussion about upgrading to 4.2 started was that I tried
> upgrading to a newer pam, which required a newer pamconfig, which in turn
> required the version of pam I was trying to install. Thus making them both
> un-upgradable (I am _not_ going to force no-dependencies on something that
> can lock me out of my system).
What is the problem? Mention both packages at the same time on the command
line of the "rpm -i" command (as in "rpm -i pam-* pamconfig-*"), and it
will install them flawlessly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Shnitman <alexsh@linux.org.il> // http://alexs.home.ml.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- Re: RH4.2?
- From: Yaron <yaron@Starlight.trendline.co.il>