[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Umsdos over VFAT?



On Thu, 6 Mar 1997, Ira Abramov (at work) wrote:

> no, and as far as my estimations go, UMSDOS will soon be dropped
> altogether. i.e.: FAT chance :)

Sad.  UMSDOS is the best thing you can do with FAT.

> > Actually windows 95 support symbolic links by use of its *.LNK files
> > (shortcuts).
> 
> HAHAHAHA! good one, almost thought you were serious for a minute....
> Unix' symbolic links don't cause your disk to format itself while you surf
> the web...

Never heard about this.  How can shortcuts cause this behavior?

Vadik.

--
Vadim Vygonets   vadik@cs.huji.ac.il   Sysadmin? Me?! Naah...
I think that I shall never see a poem as lovely as a binary tree.


Follow-Ups: References: