[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Distributions ???????



On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Peter Lorand Peres wrote:

> If you are into hacking, definitely Slackware. Else RH has a good name for
> easy installation, but... it's too commercial for many's tastes. This
> means that it is different enough from 'standard' Linux to make you want
> ONLY RH packages after that.

I have to agree, I have been running self customized Slackware versions 
from the start, but it needs much more attention at start, don't use
Slackware unless you know you'll be able to find & install everything
yourself, or unless you are into hacking like Peter here said.

RedHat will do just fine for you.

--Ariel


> 
> OnSun, 14 Dec 1997, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> > 
> > What is better: redhat or slackwere
> > What is the difference
> > why there is deference (can't they make just one distribution)
> > 
> 
> Peter Lorand Peres
> ------------------
> plp@actcom.co.il 100310.2360 on CIS (please use Internet address for mail)
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/plp
> 
> "The creed of Inland Revenue is simple: 'If we can bring one little smile to one
> little face today - then somebody's screwed up somewhere' - David Frost
> 
> (Note: The above stands valid in all countries until proven wrong)
> 

   +---------------------------------------------------------------+
   | Ariel Biener                                                  |
   | e-mail: ariel@post.tau.ac.il        Work ph: 03-6406086       |
   | fingerprint = 07 D1 E5 3E EF 6D E5 82 0B E9 21 D4 3C 7D 8B BC |
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+