[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proxy support in apache
Amos Shapira <amos@gezernet.co.il> writes:
> I wanted Apache 1.2 for that reason too (in addition to others,
> of course), but under Debian. A very good advice I got was to
> simply install squid. It is supposed to be better than apache
> when proxy in concerned. Was a snap to install (now still
> in experimental stages, until we get our dedicated proxy
> server up and running) and can cooperate with other squid servers
> in your network neightborhood to share the cache.
>
I am running SQUID. However, I didn't know that Apache proxy support
was worse than the one by squid. I don't need all those cache sharing
bells-n-whistles. I just thought it'd be better to have one hungry
process (apache) instead of two.
After all, it's easier to maintain one utility instead of two :)
--
-Alexander
==============================================================================
Alexander L. Belikoff abel@bfr.co.il
Berger Financial Research Ltd.
=============================================================================
Follow-Ups:
References: