[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Umsdos over VFAT?
On Thu, 6 Mar 1997, Ira Abramov (at work) wrote:
> no, and as far as my estimations go, UMSDOS will soon be dropped
> altogether. i.e.: FAT chance :)
Sad. UMSDOS is the best thing you can do with FAT.
> > Actually windows 95 support symbolic links by use of its *.LNK files
> > (shortcuts).
>
> HAHAHAHA! good one, almost thought you were serious for a minute....
> Unix' symbolic links don't cause your disk to format itself while you surf
> the web...
Never heard about this. How can shortcuts cause this behavior?
Vadik.
--
Vadim Vygonets vadik@cs.huji.ac.il Sysadmin? Me?! Naah...
I think that I shall never see a poem as lovely as a binary tree.
Follow-Ups:
References: