[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a small distribution pingpong
On Sat, 27 Jun 1998, Guy Cohen wrote:
> > in what way does this NOT describe redhat?
>
> i the way that redhat is for guys that like there os ready and preperd to go.
let me rephrase: what does Slackerware offer you that is better than RH?
any sources that won't compile? any configurations that won't be possible?
OTOH: many redhat features are not mirrored in slack.
> Its a fact, and well known one, that slackware is more secure then redhat.
never heard of it before... where is it said? what are the details please?
> the only reason redhat is more widely installed
> is because of its becoming an out of the box OS.
and that's a bad thing?
--
Ira Abramov <ira(a)scso.com> whois: IA58 (a linux enthusiast)
She sells cshs by the cshore. - Rob Malda