[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: a small distribution pingpong



On Sat, 27 Jun 1998, Guy Cohen wrote:

> > in what way does this NOT describe redhat?
> 
> i the way that redhat is for guys that like there os ready and preperd to go.

let me rephrase: what does Slackerware offer you that is better than RH?
any sources that won't compile? any configurations that won't be possible?

OTOH: many redhat features are not mirrored in slack.

> Its a fact, and well known one, that slackware is more secure then redhat.

never heard of it before... where is it said? what are the details please?

> the only reason redhat is more widely installed
> is because of its becoming an out of the box OS.

and that's a bad thing?


--
Ira Abramov    <ira(a)scso.com>     whois: IA58   (a linux enthusiast)

She sells cshs by the cshore.       - Rob Malda