[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current "selective extinction" debate in /.
Since I'm not a member of a Christian church (and not a newborn too)
my blood seems save so far.
Yes one has to come out and put something against such news messages.
If you don't say anything, others will think they who brought up the
topic are right. If you want the whole thing removed from the table
the same thing applies. In addition people will cry "censorship".
Clarification is IMHO the way to go. People have to check information
before they send it to the world. If they don't, then they'll have to
post follow ups (sic!).
Enjoy & Shalom
Hans
--
blinux == http://www.hzo.cubenet.de/blinux/
ios++ == http://www.leb.net/hzo
On Tue, 17 Nov 1998, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
>
> > Arguing with ethics (that Israeli people wouldn't support such a
> > "weapon") and pointing at the credibility of this English news
> > paper seems IMHO a better way to discuss the matter.
>
> To discuss the matter? Maybe we should also prove with facts that we don't
> drink Cristian newborns' blood at Pesach? And officially declare that we
> don't plan to establish World Zionist Dictatorship? Any other interesting
> matter to discuss?
>
> And I won't believe anynthing printed in ".* Times" except its own chief
> editor's name and price, until I cross-check it ten times. And even then.
>