[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: redhat5.0 CDs + fetchmail



On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Amos Shapira wrote:

> Oron Peled <oron@actcom.co.il> wrote:
> |>From fetchmail manual page:
> |
> |BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY
> | This  program is descended from and replaces popclient, by
> | Carl Harris <ceharris@mal.com>; 
> |
> |So, there is not point in refering popclient/fetchmail
> |as different entities anymore.
> 
> At least from my exeprience, there is a big difference between
> popclient and fetchmail.  Just because fetchmail stems from popclient
> a few years ago doesn't meant it can't do many things that popclient
> doesn't.
To put this into logic I understand:
fetchmail stems from popclient :-
	(not) doesn't mean that it (not) can't DO MANY THINGS,
	that popclient does not do.

The way I get this paragraph, you are saying that fetchmail does more than
popclient since it is newer. Cool expression. You should be a politician
or write psychometrics exam forms <G>

Not meant to be a flame ;)

> 
> --Amos
> 
> --Amos Shapira                    | "Of course Australia was marked for
> 133 Shlomo Ben-Yosef st.          |  glory, for its people had been chosen
> Jerusalem 93 805                  |  by the finest judges in England."
> ISRAEL        amos@gezernet.co.il |                     -- Anonymous
> 
> 
> 
>