[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a small distribution pingpong
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Peter L. Peres wrote:
>
> >
> > >Ira
> >
> > Slackware nerve was and is not meant as a workstation OS. It is meant for
> > guys who need to learn and/or change the system to suit their needs. If
> > you rip out utilities and replace libraries 2x a day and need to shut down
> > all servers and start THOSE 4 and then start over, Slackware is for you.
>
> in what way does this NOT describe redhat?
i the way that redhat is for guys that like there os ready and preperd to go.
>
> said by whom? RedHat is more widely installed and therefore more likely to
> be tested for security holes by more people (and RedHat are quick to fix
> those)
>
A too Brootus ?!
what your saying feets the MS folks.
Its a fact, and well known one, that slackware is more secure then redhat.
the only reason redhat is more widely installed
is because of its becoming an out of the box OS.
>
> --
> Ira Abramov <ira(a)scso.com> whois: IA58 (a linux enthusiast)
>
> She sells cshs by the cshore. - Rob Malda
>
>
regards,
Guy Cohen
Barak ITC Unix System Administrator
Tel: 972-3-9001647
guy@barak.net.il