[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian 2.0
On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Yannai A. Gonczarowski wrote:
> In S.u.S.E., Solaris, and I think that in debian it should be too, Runlevel 2
> is the same as runlevel 3, but without network serving (no export via nfs, no
> httpd, no smbd, no ypserv, etc...).
like I said, but this debian still came up with runlevel 2 by default in
inittab, nad the exact same settings in both rc2.d and rc3.d
> Now you can argue which of these approaches is more common, but the fact that
> RedHat chose to go one way hardly makes it the standard way. On the contrary,
> I am pretty sure that the number of all those who use some of the
> distributions/other unixes I mentioned is greater than the number of all those
> using RedHat and/or Slackware.
I won't be so sure. it's not impossible that there are more linux
installations than any other Unix in the world right now. some estimates
say that linux stands for 2/3 of the unices currently, and at LEAST
25%-30% of that is redhat...
- References:
- Re: Debian 2.0
- From: "Yannai A. Gonczarowski" <yannaigo@leyada.jlm.k12.il>