[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OFFTOPIC (was: Re: ActiveX - Big Brother threat (was: ...))
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Uri Bruck wrote:
> Who said anything about ActiveX?
> Uri
[... some paranoid warnings about Big Brothers who use
ActiveX were snipped ...]
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> >
> > [... snipped ...]
> >
> > > ... I think we still should be in arms against M$-conform
> > > web-designing with all kind of propriety extensions that only run on
> > > Windows/IE. I think the great danger lies there and NOT in the encoding
> > > issue. The moment all the interactive parts need ActiveX or any of their
^^^^^^^
|||||||
|||||||
|||||||
> > > other 'features', all non-M$ users are left out and maybe still able to
> > > see the page, but not contribute.
--- Omer
Internet E-mail: xlacha1@wizard.weizmann.ac.il
omerz@actcom.co.il
WWW home page: http://www.weizmann.ac.il/~xlacha1/
DEAF-L FAQ home page: http://www.weizmann.ac.il/deaf-info/
WARNING: Any and all commercial junk E-mail sent to my address(es) will be
returned to the postmaster of the offending site for inspection. By
sending me junk E-mail messages, you agree to pay me US$500.- per message
received plus any legal fees incurred while collecting the amount due from
you - for the service of downloading it to my PC.