[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some Comments [was Re: Article for Slashdot]
On 09-Sep-98 Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> Well, it seems a bit weird to me that Federal Court can define what is
> Java and what isn't... Some people in some big country are just crazy on
> lawyers and courts, I fear.
M$ used the Java Trademark with permission but changed A LOT of the semantics:
1. Removed the RMI libraries (are mandatory by the Java Spec.)
2. Added classes to standard libraries (forbidden, adding your own
libraries is OK).
3. Changing the INTERFACES to methods in ~30-40 standard classes.
Since this was obviously done to deteriorate Java platform independence,
Javasoft sued M$ for breaking the copyright terms (and won).
BTW: It's a very known M$ trick. They are doing now the same thing with
Kerberos.
They take the fame of the product "Look Mom we have KERBEROS in NT-5" but
change the protocol in incompatible ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Oron Peled Voice/Fax: +972-4-8228492
oron@actcom.co.il http://www.actcom.co.il/~oron
Linux: Because rebooting is for adding new hardware