[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
What color is the sky in YOUR world?
Anecdote 1:
a few months back, at the DAC show in San Francisco, isd Magazine had an
NT vs. Linux bash meeting. the Microsoft guy on the panel was faced by a
room full of about 100-150 EDA professionals all very supportive of Unix.
one of the points raised was that of NT's poor support of scripting tools,
to that the Microsoft guy replied "Scripting is exactly what keeps Unix
back and stops inovation! we have drag and drop and DDE and OLE to solve
all that!" (or something like that). To that point, Rob Walker of VA
Research stood up and objected: "scripting and pipes are the natural way
of things! the human body is made of input (points at mouth), pipes
(points at stomach) and output (points at his rear end :)"
the NT guy admitted quietly after the meeting when I stood and asked him
in private on the way out, that NT is indeed going to have a pckage of
scripting tools ported for it one day (I wonder why he didn't announce it
during the debate itself?). I almost forgot the incedent, until someone
forwarded the following story to SVLUG's mailing list:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
To: 0xdeadbeef@substance.abuse.blackdown.org
Forwarded-by: Shawn Brown <shawnb@cisco.com>
Forwarded-by: Dan Rich <drich@cisco.com>
I've been attending the USENIX NT and LISA NT (Large Installation
Systems Administration for NT) conference in downtown Seattle this
week.
One of those magical Microsoft moments(tm) happened yesterday and
I thought that I'd share. Non-geeks may not find this funny at
all, but those in geekdom (particularly UNIX geekdom) will
appreciate it.
Greg Sullivan, a Microsoft product manager (henceforth MPM), was
holding forth on a forthcoming product that will provide Unix
style scripting and shell services on NT for compatibility and to
leverage UNIX expertise that moves to the NT platform. The
product suite includes the MKS (Mortise Kern Systems) windowing
Korn shell, a windowing PERL, and lots of goodies like awk, sed
and grep. It actually fills a nice niche for which other products
(like the MKS suite) have either been too highly priced or not
well enough integrated.
An older man, probably mid-50s, stands up in the back of the room
and asserts that Microsoft could have done better with their
choice of Korn shell. He asks if they had considered others that
are more compatible with existing UNIX versions of KSH.
The MPM said that the MKS shell was pretty compatible and should
be able to run all UNIX scripts.
The questioner again asserted that the MKS shell was not very
compatible and didn't do a lot of things right that are defined in
the KSH language spec.
The MPM asserted again that the shell was pretty compatible and
should work quite well.
This assertion and counter assertion went back and forth for a
bit, when another fellow member of the audience announced to the
MPM that the questioner was, in fact David Korn of AT&T (now
Lucent) Bell Labs. (David Korn is the author of the Korn shell)
Uproarious laughter burst forth from the audience, and it was one
of the only times that I have seen a (by then pink cheeked) MPM
lost for words or momentarily lacking the usual unflappable
confidence. So, what's a body to do when Microsoft reality
collides with everyone elses?
---Lisa