[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ZDNN: MS porting Office to Linux?




http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2224863,00.html
Title: ZDNN: MS porting Office to Linux?
ZDNet
   Site Map

Search ZDNN

 
Page One
Headline Scan
News Bursts

AnchorDesk
Business
Commentary
Computing
CyberCrime
Internet
Investor
MSNBC News
Silicon Spin
ZDY2K


X10.com - The SuperSite for Home Automation!

Resources
  News Specials
  News Elsewhere
  Company Finder
  Custom News
  Contact Us
  Corrections

Other ZD News
  PC Week
  Inter@ctive Week
  Sm@rt Reseller
  MacWeek
  GameSpot
  ZD Infobeads
  ZDTV News

First USA!

Resellers, click here.


Get 3.9% APR, Get Instant Credit - Click here!



Reviews | News | Downloads | Shop | Games




MS porting Office to Linux?
It may sound crazy, but developers say all the signs -- and rumors -- are there.

By Mary Jo Foley, Sm@rt Reseller
March 11, 1999 4:34 PM PT



MS Office for Linux Could Microsoft Corp. be doing the unthinkable in porting Office to the Linux operating system?

Rumors concerning the existence of an Office port to Linux have been circulating increasingly in recent weeks.


'[Microsoft] techies are programmers in the dev [development] group. They are running Linux on boxes at Redmond and most have Linux on their home computers'
-- An anonymous developer

Since last fall, when open source advocate Eric Raymond published an internal Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT) document outlining the company's view on Linux, Microsoft's interest in the open source operating system has been well documented and analyzed. The so-called "Halloween Memos" did not mention any intention on Microsoft's part to port Office, one of its cash cows, to Linux.




Would you like to see Linux meet Office? Add your comments to the bottom of this page.


However, when asked earlier this week whether anyone at Microsoft is currently involved in porting Office to Linux, Steve Sinofsky, vice president of Microsoft Office, said "I can't talk about that right now." He added that, "Linux is not there yet for end-user productivity applications. Lots of factors need to gel before we make a commitment [to delivering Office on Linux]."

Developers: Work is underway
But developers outside of Microsoft claim that the software maker has gone beyond the contemplation stage. Last week, Unix expert and technical author Simson Garfinkle mentioned on a radio talk show broadcast in the Boston area that he had corresponded with developers with inside knowledge of Microsoft's Office Linux porting efforts. Garfinkle declined to comment beyond what he said during the radio show.

Another developer active on a number of industry news groups mentioned that he had been in touch with developers working for Microsoft who were working on moving Windows application programming interfaces (APIs) to Linux.










R E A D



Microsoft: Linux threatens Windows




IBM to sell Linux-based computers




The powerful allure of Linux




Linux preps for desktop assault




"These [Microsoft] techies are programmers in the dev [development] group. They are running Linux on boxes at Redmond and most have Linux on their home computers. I don't think that MS is afraid of Linux but they ought to be," said the developer, who requested anonymity.

Another developer and Linux advocate, who also requested anonymity, agreed that a decision by Microsoft to port Office to Linux could have the unintended effect of fueling Linux at NT's expense.

A Microsoft Office port to Linux "will be good for corporate adoption of Linux," the developer said. "I can tell you that I would be able to move my main workstation over to Linux if I had Office for it, since that is what my employer standardized on."

Hurdles ahead
If Microsoft decides to field an Office Linux product, it will have to overcome some major hurdles first.

Porting Windows applications to Linux is not easy, especially if the Windows apps are tied tightly to the operating system, notes Scott Petry, vice president of marketing with Cygnus Solutions, a cross-platform Windows-Linux porting tool vendor based in Sunnyvale, Calif. Cygnus is working with Corel Corp. to port WordPerfect to Linux via the WINE Windows-to-Linux translation layer.

"Office would be one of the most challenging apps to move to Unix or Linux," Petry notes. "There's the Win32 APIs and Microsoft's implementation of the Win32 APIs, which is what Office relies on. A lot of hand-coding would need to be done to move Office just to the standard Win32 API set, let alone to Linux."

Microsoft also will need to create a viable business model, via which the company and its partners can make money from Office running on an open-source platform. While Corel (Nasdaq:COSFF) and Star Divison GmbH have made public their intentions to offer desktop suites on Linux, Microsoft's main rival, Lotus Development Corp., has not announced any intentions to move SmartSuite to Linux.

"Customers are asking us about Linux, but we can't make money on it today," says Howard Diamond, chief executive officer of Corporate Software & Technology, a Norwood, Mass., software reseller. "Our challenge is walking the line between shareware and the corporate market. The wrap-around things -- like applications services and support, is what you need to sell."

If Microsoft does undertake an Office Linux port -- even if it is only a prototype or test -- it wouldn't be the first time that the company has made sure to cover all its bases with the Office platform. Microsoft historians will remember that Microsoft denied to the bitter end that the company was doing a version of Office written in Java, only to admit officially last year that the company was working on a Java-ized Office project, which it ended up scrapping.

Additional reporting by John Spooner, PCWeek.


Click here to see more computing stories

Talkback Articles
Post TalkBack
 How very scary. Will the... - Chris Rizzo
 MS is working to it? Yes... - Patrice Girard
 Microsoft as a corporate... - Seth Fagbemi
 What a godsend! Now Linu... - Curt Wuollet
 I think MS Office for Li... - Todd Sauve
 Another smooth move on M... - Digitali Binar
 They'll NEVER do it! Po... - Eugene Koontz
 My first reaction was, w... - Eric Stevens
 Why wouldn't MS want to ... - Virginia Metze
 Since I must have compad... - George Metz
 They probably will, and ... - Adam Hamm
 There were unsubstantiat... - James Ryan
 What you folks didn't fi... - Raymond Chuang
 It would not catch on as... - Seth
 MS might follow, but nev... - Greg Leisner
 What I don't understand ... - Leonard Lanza
 No self-respecting Linux... - Ryan A.
 Porting Office to Linux ... - Donald Polak
 Bet your butt on the "Mc... - Matt Pritchett
 Microsoft would surely b... - Paul Rogers
 I would have to WAIT for... - Gary Kelley
 A move like this might m... - TJ Leverette
 Man of Microsoft does th... - Carlos Gonzalez
 Why are you talking abou... - Jens Vagelpohl
 Not if it performs the w... - Bob Culbertson
 Stardivision already has... - Matt Kohner
 Sounds to me like the on... - Scott Waybright
 Microsoft's overall stra... - David Miller
 1999 is turning out to b... - Maelstrom
 I'd be afraid of putting... - Jason Dufair
 Wow! If Microsoft is ta... - Richard Finney
 I would not take Office ... - William Heymann
 I personally think the i... - Lisa Bohm
 HA ! The beginning of t... - Gregg M
 if the devil came down t... - j. yamisha
 Office on Linux... Hmm... - thorbjorn
 Corel has already releas... - William Norman
 Actually, this would be ... - Jeff Peiffer
 Now that I think about i... - Tom C.
 You heard it here first:... - Alan Mitchell, MD
 Talk about a stretch! ... - Percius P. Dobbs
 If the actually port MS ... - Ben Rosenberg
  Wonderful, I would buy ... - Robert Kelly
 Hey, it's always good to... - Paul Dorman
 I would be shocked. Ther... - Mark Bowman
 hmm sounds ok to me as l... - Ryan Speed
 I agree that porting Off... - Paul Hunks
 I hate Micro$oft Office.... - Clarke Wood
 This is a pretty logical... - KevinL
 Office on Linux will cha... - Jonathan Maddox
 Let's "just say No" and ... - Deirdre Saoirse
 I'd buy this if they mak... - Michael Llaneza
 If this linux port of MS... - john monteiro
 I don't buy it. If MS is... - Phil Nadeau
 No, thanks, we are doing... - kap
 im sure there are plenty... - Jason Thomson
 I think this is potentia... - Naresh Sikha
 Yeah, sure. Just like th... - Nitin Borwankar
 Vaporwear. Another way ... - Jake Winegar
 First and foremost I do ... - Rajeswaran V
 "Linux is about stabilit... - Scott Korrubowitz
 More of the same. Micro... - Harry Stone
 Why do I need a Microsof... - Cire Lepueh
 RE: directx on linux. I ... - Ruben Arce
 If it is fully-featured,... - Ben Sandler
 MS Office for Linux does... - Marcel Meissel
 I am more interested in ... - Jun Sawada
 Linux Office??? Hahaha..... - Maya
 MS wins by offering Work... - null
 I would rather not see M... - Blake Stearman
 What ? MS porting Office... - Filipe de Matos
 Yes I would like to see ... - Bent Mathiesen
 I've read a few of these... - Ole Kristian Lona
 This is an excellent ide... - Mark Lehrer
 Unix conventions please ... - Richard Corfield
 Microsoft has already ma... - Tore Hansen
 I have been working at M... - David
 Why not? More options f... - George Kopeliadis
 This might be the beginn... - Alan Campbell
 Being new to Linux (RedH... - Mark Pinson
 IE4 has been released fo... - Kevin Pesce
 Okay , but they should l... - Massimo TRENTO
 NEVER, there is corel an... - Carl faust
 Although there exists a ... - Johan Brichau
 2c: Lotus actually does ... - Craig
 This whole thing stinks ... - Michael Maginnis
 The news around the Offi... - Anderson Maciel
 This is just another par... - Joe Tex
 Will Linux be killed by ... - Konrad Janssen
 Why even bother when Sta... - Philip D Bucket
 Re: Seth Fagbemi's comme... - Nate Smith
 Yes, Please. While I am... - Mike Lynn
 I canït believe it!!!!!!... - Jose Tomas Garcia
 MS-Linux - now that's ev... - Tom Schaefer
 Bad for document standar... - Ganesh C. Prasad
 Next thing coming up wou... - Hajo Simons
 No, Microsoft can't make... - Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett
 I would be glad to see M... - Johan Persson
 It will be a very sad da... - Ari Pollak
 I think that Microsoft w... - Michael Smith
 I think they are trying ... - Robert
 Microsoft will destroy L... - Brian
 There is already a funct... - Patrick Fitzgerald
 Uh, oh. I have the feel... - Jim Mitchell
 Last I heard, nothing ha... - D. P. Cole
 MS-Hype in a total new c... - Michael Möllney
 Maybe the "MS Office peo... - Daemous Riel
 There is already a bette... - Steven Van Rossen
 It amazes me how many st... - Eric Heard
 Nothing but FUD. Read... - Robert Bringman
 VAPORWARE!!!! MS has no... - Davon Harrison
 SHAMELESS PANDERING and ... - Bob
 It'd be nice to see MS m... - Kevin Septor
 This is just a feather i... - James Bickford
 Yes, because in my offic... - Doug Gruber
 WARNING MS-Linux soon ! ... - Franck B.
 This has to be good for ... - Adrian Shaw
 Other Office Suites on L... - Mark Dalton
 I guess MS thinks that L... - Michael Illian
 Microsoft with Linux? Ve... - Brian Sia
 The only reason I run NT... - Ken Lorentzen
 Yes! Why not? I don't s... - Christian Rudolph
 In OPENSOURCE form only ... - Dean Johnson
 It makes sense for M$ to... - Bradley Kieser
 Absolutely not!!! I came... - Frank Hale
 If Microsoft would port ... - Tobias Goeller
 Why not? Microsoft alrea... - Brian Sharpe
 all of you out there...f... - cc
 A good test for Linux. I... - Gary knutson
 MS would have to conside... - Herschel Cohen
 Tomorrow, Office; next w... - Bill McClain
 To Brian, You just don'... - scott andrews
 Misdirection. This "leak... - Russ Rowen
 This is the best thing t... - Robert Hoghaug
 Ingenious, Not able to s... - Ed Maloney
 I would like to see the ... - Ignacio Merani
 I already run Office97 i... - Rocky
 That's not surprising at... - Balu Raman, MSEE,.CCP
 I think Microsoft portin... - Ralph Howard
 If Office is ported over... - Robert
 Why would we need MSOffi... - ET
 It's possible that they ... - UNIXMAN
 I would love to have MS ... - David Davis
 If Microsoft is making a... - John Carroll
 I still wouldn't buy it.... - MadMike
 If MS ports Office to Li... - Chinh Nguyen
 I think this is a good i... - Edward Johnson, Jr.
 U Will B Assimilated! ... - Larry Shemp
 StarOffice is better. I'... - Jon Roberts
 I bought Office 6 for th... - Charles Hixson
 There are two obstacles ... - J. Schneidder
 OH, NO! This is part of... - Nathan Warmbrod
 What *nix user would _wa... - Mark Miles
 Star Office 5.01 is 1000... - Steve Cox
 If they do (I dont think... - Nick Lucent
 The fun part in watching... - Jason Amy
 Why would they stop at O... - John Kovacich
 This is the biggest MS J... - Craig Blanock
 WTH, Office for Linux?? ... - Jeremy Smith
 The user replies to this... - Mark Time
 YES! YES! YES! It will ... - Carol Rogers
 I don't see why Microsof... - Silviu Chitroceanu
 Microsoft as a corporati... - Tom Tschritter
 It would be rather suspe... - Omar O. S. Schwanzer
 Why?! Just to see Micros... - Antonio Dias
 PUNK ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... - Bill Hoffman
 My first thought was tha... - Ryan Maglich
 It's a good idea in theo... - Ryan Finnie
 Could I finally get a Al... - Steve Dobbs
 Take your hands out of L... - Victor Cooper
 Who cares? Is MS-Office... - Steve Durst
 What a joke! Here are... - tom
 Once again I read nothin... - Michael Ekstrom
 A pragmatic view of Linu... - Stefan Fiala
 Sex, drugs and rock and ... - John Dooley
 NT for free? As MS earn... - J. Kat
 I think that a port of M... - Henry Reardon
 I think they should. I ... - David Brown
 Okay, now that I've plac... - Jim Warner
 To those who are complai... - Koos vd Merwe
 I think this is just ano... - George Mitchell
 I don't think I need to ... - Roy Longton
 Preparing for MS post-tr... - Antonio Romero
 all this negativity is r... - chris
 If you were the VP of ap... - Ed Crotty
 To Michael Ekstrom, "N... - Rick Barnes
 Microsoft can't even get... - John Berger
 StarOffice is more power... - Catalin
 Smart idea! Microsoft sh... - John Vindekilde
 How could they get Offic... - Chris Adamson
 Corel is doing it....why... - Rick Lossner
 MS never writes software... - Jeffrey Hundstad
 I would still use Star O... - Deven Phillips
 



 
March 12, 1999 PM
  05:40p
  Lawmaker predicts Net taxes
  05:20p
  BULLETIN: Compaq named in two lawsuits
  04:42p
  Microsoft confirms reorg
  04:36p
  HP takes another run at Sun's Java
  03:03p
  IE 5.0 will browse and broadcast




Net taxes look likely





MS: Losing product focus?





Shareholders sue Compaq





Digital deals, Texas style





IE 5.0 will browse and broadcast





E-mail this!



Get Personal News Alert


Business

SEC eyes online brokerages


Senate seeks compromise on Y2K



Commentary

Louderback: High-speed woes


Crabb: Whither Mac summer camps?



Computing

Home appliances getting wired


Intel admits PIIs have IDs



Internet

FTC on the trail of Net scams


It's 'March Madness' on the Web








News, Financials, Products




Cygnus Solutions

Corel Corp.




Enter a company










Get our FREE digest of the day's top headlines by e-mail every morning.

Text HTML








Downloads in the news





Top



 SPONSORED LINKS
Software   Recover from data loss. @Backup free for 30 days. Click Here.
Services   9c/MINUTE LONG DISTANCE, 5c/MINUTE ON SUNDAYS!
Finance   2.9% Intro APR - Rew@rds Points - No fee - Apply Now
Software   X10.com -- The SuperSite for Home Automation
Books   Bargain Books up to 90% off at barnesandnoble.com
 ZDNET FEATURED LINKS
Downloads   Check out the best new downloads in Reviewer's Raves
Bargains!   Shop the Basement for best buys on computer products
Free Help   Got computing questions? ZDHelp has all the answers!
 MAGAZINE OFFERS
Free Offer   Get a FREE SUBSCRIPTION to Inter@ctive Week

Reviews | News | Downloads | Shop | MyZDNet | Games | ZDTV | Forums

AnchorDesk | PC Magazine | PC Week | Help! | Yahoo! Internet Life

HOME | FREE MEMBERSHIP | CONTACT US | AD INFO | ZIFF-DAVIS
 
Use of ZDNet is subject to certain Terms & Conditions
Please read ZDNet's Privacy Statement

Copyright (c) 1999 ZDNet. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of ZDNet is prohibited. ZDNet and the ZDNet logo are trademarks of Ziff-Davis Inc.

begin:vcard 
n:Meltzer;Noam
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:tsnoam@thenavy.com
note;quoted-printable:Windows 95 Definition:=0D=0A=0D=0A32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a=0D=0A16 bit patch for a=0D=0A8 bit operating system originally coded for a=0D=0A4 bit microprocessor, written by a=0D=0A2 bit company, that can't stand=0D=0A1 bit of competition=0D=0A=0D=0A
fn:Noam Meltzer
end:vcard