[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does Hebrew U. violate the GPL?
Today, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo blurbed:
> OZ>> http://cachedot.slashdot.org/articles/99/02/27/076204.shtml
>
> If they don't provide source - surely. That was the whole point of GPL -
> for good or for bad - not to allow such a situation.
ahh, but you are all on the wrong page. Linux is released under the
LGPL, not GPL.
>
> In fact, I do not understand why they won't make source available. They
> are university project, not some money-thirsty commercial venture, what
> can be the problem with source?
and who do you think funds this veture?
***coughIDFcoughArmyIntelligenceCOUGH***
sometimes, the most natural candidates for source openings have a
skeleton in the closet, like Netscape having to kick out half the code
before opening it up... c'est la vie.