[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anrti-Linux survey you might want to know about
O>> Hi,
O>> This is not Anti-Linux per-se, but it is definitly biased. It
O>> asks questions like: 'How important are these perceived Linux
O>> drawbacks?' and then lists things like: 'Not Mission Critical
O>> yet', 'Open Software', 'Different distributions/GUI's' with the
For some it's really disadvantge. Read recent Microsoft employees' talk
about "nothing good is free, so if it's free, it can't be good" - you'll
catch the line. And differences in distributions can annoy even
experienced user - I'm here third day trying to make some RPMS from
another distribution (where it works) to work - no success and nobody
knows why yet... Competition is good, but don't tell this to the poor guy
who has to do those "all-compatible" things ;)
O>> only options being 'V. important, Important, Of less importance'.
O>> I don't see anything listing 'This is an advantage, not a
O>> drawback'.
You may not to check anything, if it isn't important, right? That is just
bad usability design, but nothing anti-Linux.
O>> 'Not Mission Critical yet'?? From where I am standing, NT is the
O>> OS which is not mission critical yet. Mission critical = 99.99%
O>> uptime. Heck, even NT so-called clusters (phase 1?) are not
O>> mission critical. There is just no 'right' way to answer such a
O>> survey. Either way, you lose.
You might not check this one. This is for NT admins after all, so the
question "Why you still is an NT admin, and not Linux admin" is perfectly
valid. After all, they see some drawback if they didn't all move to Linux
yet ;) And this would be very useful for some to see what exactly they
think Linux is lacking.
--
frodo@sharat.co.il \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-2-6245112 /\ JRRT LotR.
http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333