[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NT vs Linux
EHB>> http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/news/msnw/nt4vLinux.asp
EHB>>
EHB>> It's a performance test which made a comparison between Linux and NT.
EHB>>
EHB>> I wonder if these results are true.
If I were you, I wouldn't believe any word of Microsoft on this matter.
They lied to US court (and this is proved), so you think they would be
more honest with you?
The quick look on the paper reveals the usual bunch of FUD on Linux (no
support, no training, no compatibility, no strategy). This is, of course,
lie from the first word to the last.
Don't get me wrong - there are things that Linux lacks. There are real
many of them. Just don't use Microsoft documents to find them - because if
even 10% of their claims were false, it would invalidate entire document,
since you don't know about any claim if it's in 10% or not. And believe
me, current lie rating is much higher than 10%.
--
frodo@sharat.co.il \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425 /\ JRRT LotR.
http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333
- References:
- NT vs Linux
- From: Erez & Hadas Boym <ehboym@internet-zahav.net>