[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bind
Hi,
ok, perhaps your are right for a single user machine. But the moment you
have even the smallest of a network, it makes sense. Also, why should bind
eat up megs of memory ? Besides that, configureing dialup not to connect
doesn't solve that reverse-lookup problem.
Schlomo
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, S. Schapiro (nessy) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think everybody should install bind. It is very easy and solves a lot of
> > NS related problems (especially those reverse lookups that trigger the
> > dialup when not having bind).
>
> What for? BIND will eat megs of my precious memory for what? Storing info
> that I do not need when I'm disconnected and which is avalible immediately
> when I'm connected?
>
> About dialup triggering - so configure your diald or whatever not to
> bother with those requests. Installing BIND just for it seems to me a bit
> of overkill.
>
> I'm not talking here of security risk of running unneeded service - more
> services means more risk, as the security is determined by weakest
> component.
> --
> frodo@sharat.co.il \/ There shall be counsels taken
> Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
> phone +972-2-6245112 /\ JRRT LotR.
> http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333
>
>
>
>